Authored by: Michael Tybel, Head of the Scienlab Solution Center – Keysight; Simon Reitemeyer, Solution Architect for the Charging Test Solution at the Scienlab Development Center – Keysight and Julian Tomczyk, Solution Marketing Specialist for Charging and Inverter Test Solutions – Keysight
As countries in a rapidly growing and changing world try to address future energy requirements, achieving sustainable transportation becomes an important challenge. Until recently, “range anxiety” was considered to be the biggest challenge of the growth of the electric vehicle (EV) market due to consumer fears of being stranded due to poor battery performance or a lack of charging infrastructure.
As the battery capacity of newer middle-class EVs reaches 60 to 80 kWh, range anxiety is becoming less of a factor, and the superior range and rapid growth of total public EV supply equipment (EVSE) installations will lead to e-mobility conquering the global mass market if the implementation is mature enough.
To make internal combustion engine (ICE) cars entirely obsolete, EVs must become truly long-range capable. For that, EV drivers must rely on the next charging point on their route being operational and interoperable with their vehicles. That might sound easy but is in fact complex to achieve.
Today, nobody would expect a new mobile device to have issues connecting to any private o rpublic Wi-Fi network. But to get there, it needed the Wireless Ethernet Compatibility Alliance (WECA1, in 2002 renamed to Wi-Fi Alliance), which developed dedicated compatibility tests that have not been included in the IEEE 802.11b standard.
Two decades later, the same situation applies to EVs and charging infrastructure. While most of the relevant normative specification was published between 2014 and 2015, it did not contain corresponding tests for how to verify implementation conformance.
The Combined Charging System (CCS) is the de facto charging protocol standard in Europe and North America (For reference: Tesla is migrating from their proprietary protocol to CCS²; Nissan recently announced a move from CHAdeMO to CCS in Europe and US³) and has the greatest market acceptance in countries outside of Japan and China.
In 2021, in the middle of a wave of 2nd generation, EVs being introduced by all major car manufacturers, charging interoperability is not solved yet. This is because a CCS charging interface is much more complex than Wi-Fi as it includes high voltage and the transfer of a significant amount of electrical energy.
Secondly, cars are designed according to specific automotive standards, while charging infrastructure is following more generic electrotechnical standards. As a result, the technical specification for EV DC charging is fragmented in multiple International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), International Organization for Standardisation (ISO) and German Institute for Standardisation (DIN) documents. There is still no conformance test specification published regarding system and safety requirements of EV and EVSE besides communication protocols. This effectively means that all currently deployed CCS products cannot undergo harmonised tests.
But this is about to change. The major industrial stakeholders, organised within the Charging Interface Initiative e.V. (CharIN), are about to publish an interoperability test program. It initially focuses on EVSE conformance tests and will allow OEMs to test their products.
While focusing on today’s interoperability challenges, the e-mobility market is developing new technologies to reach mass suitability and green goals. These goals should provide the EV driver a convenient and similar experience when charging his EV compared with refueling an internal combustion engine. Relevant issues are easy
to access and most likely automated communication between EV and charging station, along with a preferably short charging session.
Plug and Charge, Smart Charging
Currently, EVs need to be identified with Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) cards or other means at the charging station by the EV driver to verify and start a charging session and arrange its payment successfully. This procedure is error-prone and inconvenient as many different identification means and payment services exist in the market.
With Plug and Charge, specified within the ISO 15118 series, the process of identification and payment will be automated so that the EV driver only needs to plug in the charging cable to his vehicle. To support this, the charging communication and especially the information about payment need to be encrypted to provide the user a safe charging experience. In addition, while increasing the complexity of this ecosystem, payment information needs also to be communicated securely to other stakeholders via backend infrastructure.
A second step in automating EV charging is wireless charging. Without no charging cable, the EV driver would only need to park his vehicle and charging, communication and power transfer would be executed automatically.
People generally think of “green” mobility as a form of CO2 neutrality, with energy provided by renewable sources. Smart charging is a major part of this because the scheduling of charging can be controlled by intelligent load management. Criteria for scheduling are the (minimum) amount of energy needed by the connected vehicle to support the driving range of their owner/user, and minimisation of the overall power consumption in the grid. The challenge is the complexity and degree of control when talking about numerous connected charging spots and fluctuating amounts of renewable energy like solar or wind.
Such relatively unpredictable fluctuations in renewable energy sources need to be buffered when looking at time periods of high solar radiation or strong winds in contrast to cloudy and calm weather conditions. EV batteries can contribute significantly to such situations if they are seen as energy storage systems.
This provides scenarios such as “vehicle to grid” (V2G) and “vehicle to home” (V2H) technologies, where the EV battery serves as a power source for other consumers in the household whenever renewable energy sources are limited or cannot provide the necessary amount of energy. In cases where energy consumption is reported to the grid operator via smart metre and an IT cloud system, EVs and their battery packs can also help to minimise peaks in conventional energy production.
Automatic Connection Devices
For conductive charging, the next logical step to increase user convenience is to eliminate the need to exit the car and connect the charging gun to the car, which is particularly onerous in cold or wet weather conditions. Moreover, in the case of DC charging, handling can be additionally cumbersome because of the weight and rigidity of the cable.
Hence, the upcoming ISO 15118-20 standard will introduce support for Automatic Connection Devices (ACD), which can be implemented in various ways.
High-Power Charging
One additional aspect when comparing the refueling of an internal combustion engine (ICE) with the charging of an EV is charging time.
Significantly increased DC charging currents will remain manageable thanks to liquid cooled charging cables, which are lightweight and flexible in contrast to conventional variants. This, in combination with doubling battery pack voltage, allows critical decreases in typical charging time for conventional refueling.
Charging Speed Dependent on Used Charging Station
E-mobility is entering its potentially most critical phase in terms of mass adoption, and charging infrastructure is a key factor. Thanks to government policies and huge investments, the total number of charging points, including very capable high-power charging stations for long-distance journeys, will increase massively by 2025.
Smart new features will turn inconvenient charging experiences into seamless and highly automated ones that are far superior to visiting gas stations. But to get there, we have to take up an invisible but decisive challenge. Industry and standardisation bodies are struggling to integrate new, advanced features for smart charging into official norms and specifications, while maintaining backward compatibility with already deployed products.
Keysight is developing test solutions for EVs and EVSE. With its Scienlab charging test solutions, Keysight enables car manufacturers and charging station providers to test charging interfaces of EVs and EVSE during high-power charging.
Archive
- April 2024(81)
- March 2024(112)
- February 2024(109)
- January 2024(95)
- December 2023(56)
- November 2023(86)
- October 2023(97)
- September 2023(89)
- August 2023(101)
- July 2023(104)
- June 2023(113)
- May 2023(103)
- April 2023(93)
- March 2023(129)
- February 2023(77)
- January 2023(91)
- December 2022(90)
- November 2022(125)
- October 2022(117)
- September 2022(137)
- August 2022(119)
- July 2022(99)
- June 2022(128)
- May 2022(112)
- April 2022(108)
- March 2022(121)
- February 2022(93)
- January 2022(110)
- December 2021(92)
- November 2021(107)
- October 2021(101)
- September 2021(81)
- August 2021(74)
- July 2021(78)
- June 2021(92)
- May 2021(67)
- April 2021(79)
- March 2021(79)
- February 2021(58)
- January 2021(55)
- December 2020(56)
- November 2020(59)
- October 2020(78)
- September 2020(72)
- August 2020(64)
- July 2020(71)
- June 2020(74)
- May 2020(50)
- April 2020(71)
- March 2020(71)
- February 2020(58)
- January 2020(62)
- December 2019(57)
- November 2019(64)
- October 2019(25)
- September 2019(24)
- August 2019(14)
- July 2019(23)
- June 2019(54)
- May 2019(82)
- April 2019(76)
- March 2019(71)
- February 2019(67)
- January 2019(75)
- December 2018(44)
- November 2018(47)
- October 2018(74)
- September 2018(54)
- August 2018(61)
- July 2018(72)
- June 2018(62)
- May 2018(62)
- April 2018(73)
- March 2018(76)
- February 2018(8)
- January 2018(7)
- December 2017(6)
- November 2017(8)
- October 2017(3)
- September 2017(4)
- August 2017(4)
- July 2017(2)
- June 2017(5)
- May 2017(6)
- April 2017(11)
- March 2017(8)
- February 2017(16)
- January 2017(10)
- December 2016(12)
- November 2016(20)
- October 2016(7)
- September 2016(102)
- August 2016(168)
- July 2016(141)
- June 2016(149)
- May 2016(117)
- April 2016(59)
- March 2016(85)
- February 2016(153)
- December 2015(150)