*Authored by: Philip Krantz, Quantum Engineering Solutions, Keysight Technologies*

About forty years ago, Richard Feynman postulated that quantum systems could be simulated much more efficiently by using computer hardware that operates quantum mechanically. This means that information is stored and processed in a system that obeys the laws of quantum mechanics and that these laws form the basis for the information processing. To do this, the information in a quantum processor is encoded into the states of its qubits (quantum bits), a two-level system with some remarkable properties.

**Superposition states**

As opposed to the classical bit, where information is represented by the “on” or “off” states of a transistor, a qubit is not limited to only being in the states “0” or “1”, but can be in both at the same time. This fundamental concept in quantum physics, is known as **superposition**.

Superposition reflects the statistical nature of quantum mechanics and is maintained for as long time as the system is not observed or measured. When we measure the quantum state, the system collapses into one specific state, probabilistically ending up in one of the two states. For this reason, we need to keep the qubit protected and non-observed throughout the course of a quantum algorithm.

**Decoherence – Loss of “quantumness” **

Although the idea of a quantum processor has been around for a long time, there is not yet a large-scale realisation of a quantum computer. One of the main reasons why a quantum computer is so hard to build is that the lifetime of the qubit superposition is limited. One of the main challenges for quantum engineers is therefore to build as long-lived quantum systems as possible, without compromising the performance of the processor.

The loss of quantum coherence is known as ** decoherence** and it happens when quantum superpositions collapse into classical states when they are measured. This happens regardless of whether it is an intentional measurement by an observer or caused by interference from the environment – the quantum system simply cannot tell the difference.

To measure qubit coherence time is therefore a cornerstone in any quantum lab, as it provides important information about the quality of the qubit and its shielding and how it is operated using quantum gates, as well as the characteristics of the qubit readout.

The coherence time of a qubit can be divided into two different timescales, depending on the impact that interference has on its state: The first is energy relaxation time – which is the time after which the qubit state relaxes to its ground state. This type of decay is non-reversible since the energy leaves the system. The second is dephasing time, which is the time scale after which the state loses its phase information Loss of phase coherence can, under certain circumstances, be reversible, by applying a refocusing gate sequence.

**Entanglement and quantum interference**

Quantum superposition states can also extend between quantum systems, so that an operation on one system immediately affects the others. This type of interaction is called *entanglement* and provides quantum computers with their advantageous scaling in computational power with each added qubit.

To illustrate this, consider the number of complex coefficients needed to describe the full quantum register. A single qubit state can be represented by two complex coefficients, and , corresponding to the probability of finding the system in states and , respectively. If we want to represent the states of two entangled qubits, we need four complex coefficients, i.e. , , , and so on. In fact, the number of coefficients scales as , where is the number of qubits. This means that in a qubit register containing 300 qubits, the number of coefficients is larger than the number of atoms in the known universe.

In a quantum algorithm, performed on a qubit register containing many qubits, the expected outcome contains a statistical distribution between the probabilities to find the qubits in certain states. Given that the qubits are entangled with each other, the answer to a computational task is retrieved by analysing the quantum interference pattern (or correlations) of its outcome states.

**Keysight in Quantum**

Keysight is uniquely positioned within the quantum eco-system to provide modular and scalable quantum control systems. By leveraging Keysight’s long experience in advanced measurement equipment, our qubit control solutions and precise measurement instrumentation enable researchers to engineer and scale superior systems. In 2020, we expanded our solution portfolio with the addition of Labber software, enabling our customers easy access to instrument control and automation. Our combined expertise in quantum computing and system engineering enable a new quantum engineering era.

## Archive

- April 2021(46)
- March 2021(79)
- February 2021(58)
- January 2021(55)
- December 2020(56)
- November 2020(59)
- October 2020(78)
- September 2020(72)
- August 2020(64)
- July 2020(71)
- June 2020(74)
- May 2020(50)
- April 2020(71)
- March 2020(71)
- February 2020(58)
- January 2020(62)
- December 2019(57)
- November 2019(64)
- October 2019(25)
- September 2019(24)
- August 2019(14)
- July 2019(23)
- June 2019(54)
- May 2019(82)
- April 2019(76)
- March 2019(71)
- February 2019(67)
- January 2019(75)
- December 2018(44)
- November 2018(47)
- October 2018(74)
- September 2018(54)
- August 2018(61)
- July 2018(72)
- June 2018(62)
- May 2018(62)
- April 2018(73)
- March 2018(76)
- February 2018(8)
- January 2018(7)
- December 2017(6)
- November 2017(8)
- October 2017(3)
- September 2017(4)
- August 2017(4)
- July 2017(2)
- June 2017(5)
- May 2017(6)
- April 2017(11)
- March 2017(8)
- February 2017(16)
- January 2017(10)
- December 2016(12)
- November 2016(20)
- October 2016(7)
- September 2016(102)
- August 2016(168)
- July 2016(141)
- June 2016(149)
- May 2016(117)
- April 2016(59)
- March 2016(85)
- February 2016(153)
- December 2015(150)